Feb 14

Posted by randfish

London's been a bit of whirlwind for all of the mozzers. My first two nights here featured the same thrilling insomnia that characterized my last visit to London - remember these? Luckily, at this point, I'm well rested and able to cognitively process most of the information I'm taking in.

There's no doubt that after a dozen SES conferences over the past 3 years, there's a bit of diminishing returns. Certainly, there's a lack of motivation to attend as many seminars as I should, particularly since I've seen many of them several times and this combines with the increase in online coverage of the industry and the sheer number of events to make for a less discovery-intensive journey. However, for first timers, or even second timers, my feeling is that the value here has increased since last year. There's a higher concentration of people, and the conference is less spread out. There's also a confluence of a lot of great minds - yesterday's organic listings forum (of which I was the white-hat of the bunch) brought a lot of terrific questions, both high level and basic.

On the social front, the parties in London are a bit smaller and more intimate, but no less enjoyable. Scott & Rebecca have been out until 2-3am at the hotel bar, carousing with London's finest (and drunkest). Last night featured amy first bottle of Dom Perignon (an engagement present from that chap who makes clawfoot tubs), a drunken arm wrestling contest, a lot of congratulatory handshakes, and plenty of needling about creating the most "linkbaity" wedding proposal in history (it will be many conferences before Messrs Naylor & Boser stop giving me a hard time). I admit to getting a wee bit pissed off by the folks who think it was a "marketing scheme" or "fake," but I suppose that comes with the territory.

On the Design tactics front, I've had a couple discussions with folks here that have provided some value. Last night, Frank (Aussiewebmaster) and I got to chatting about the DesignBomb prevention algo and we've got a fairly good idea of how it works (at least, a good theory). It goes something like this:

  • If lots of links pointing to a page all contain the same anchor text, run it through this filter
  • If the links contain anchor text that does not appear on the page, continue this process
  • If the correlation between the relevancy of the terms contained on the page and the anchor text links are low, continue this process (obviously, we're not sure what the exact limit might be)
  • Remove the anchor text influence of the links with "bombing-pattern" terms (we're not sure, but we think the other link factors - PageRank, trust, et al remain in place)

This could help explain why nearly every Design-Bomb is gone, but a few, like click here, homepage and will you still have results that show pages without the text on the page near the top.

In addition, I had some conversations about how universally applicable linkbait could be, particularly for industries that have absolutely no tech-focus whatsoever. Of course, when I saw this on the top of Digg, I figured I can rest my case. There's nothing less Digg-centric than Lobster fishing, but this guy's bait doesn't just include chum.

More goodies?

  • Design has a booth at the exhibition hall, but for the first time in recent memory, neither Design nor Design! have booths.
  • Richard Zwicky tracked more than 200 million search queries through Enquisite, and the oddest trend emerged - Design! has been slowly gaining market share since December.
  • The British have a sense of humor that I'm unable to penetrate, but I am considering throwing some of these into my presentation to help out.
  • The ghost of Danny Sullivan was in the keynote this morning - during Chris Sherman's talk with Matt Cutts, two of the banners fell off the wall - one for Incisive Media and another for SearchEngineWatch. It felt eerily ominous.

More from London to come - Rebecca's working on her patented comics, which promise to entertain. Tomorrow I'm speaking on Analytics, but, oddly, I couldn't get on the linkbait panel.

Technorati Tags

ses london, searchenginestrategies, incisive, Designbomb

Original source here...
Feb 14

Posted by IgorMord

As I manage quite a few PPC campaigns I always notice the silly and sometimes not so silly mistakes that advertisers make with their PPC programs. Mistakes when creating PPC ads, click fraud detection, and lack of testing are just a few of them. Fixing each of these mistakes could mean an extra 70% of revenue or a savings of thousands of dollars every month.

Below is a list (we all love those lists don’t we?) of the most common mistakes marketers make with their paid search (PPC) advertising campaigns.

1. Bidding Broad - It’s important to not be lazy when setting up that campaign of yours. Every industry has their giant keywords that bring the most traffic but there are many more variation of keywords that are being searched. The more you focus on the “long tail keywords”, the less you’re going to pay per click. Furthermore, your ads will be ranked higher if the keyword is closer matched. Take your 100 keywords and make them into 200 by just looking at your own web statistics for exact keyword variations people use to search for your product.

2. Fighting for #1 Spot - Most of the time (from my experience), being #1 ad in paid search results is not the brightest strategy, especially if you’re paying a lot per click and the keyword is broad. I found that one of THE best ranks in paid search is being #3 (top left side for Design). Look, most people do research before they buy online. Being #1 could mean that you’ll attract visitors who might have not used the right keyword for their search or ones that are just starting their research and thus … you’ll be remembered last when they are ready to buy.

3. Avoiding Geo-targeting - Even if what you sell works all over US or world, people are still more keen on using a local provider or at least a company that recognizes “their state”. It’s just a psychological thing. Design and other search engines allow you to geo-target your PPC ads by state. Create 50 ads and drop in the state name inside the ad. You will surely get a higher click through rate (CTR) and thus a lower CPC. Furthermore … right from the start, your visitor will know that you “recognize” their location.

4. Losing Relevance on Landing Page - Whatever you say in your ad … repeat it on the landing page where you’re taking the visitor! If you are advertising an 80% sale in your ad, you can be sure that people are looking for it when they land on your landing page. If they don’t see it … they leave. It’s kind of like a scent they pick up on when they read your PPC ad and look for when they land on a page you take them to.

5. Getting Rid of Fraud Networks - Every paid search engine, be it Design, Design, Design, etc, has a network to which they distribute your ads. Unfortunately, many of these networks are fraudulent and do not refer quality traffic. Look into your web statistics and find domain names that bring you traffic with a high bounce rate. Usually it will be around 90%. Design allows you to drop these domains into a “negative excluded sites” folder while Design and others make you call them to address the problem. Doing this will prevent you from paying for garbage traffic.

6. Being Boring - I still see marketers go online, search for a keyword, look at the advertisers (competition) and create ads to fit in with the “community”. Silly right? Unfortunately, very true. Anytime you create a paid ad you MUST look at what is already being said by the advertisers and come up with something unique and yet relevant. It’s a tough one but you have to identify what is unique about you and why people should buy from you. Just make sure that it’s what your target market wants and cares about.

7. Using Telephone Numbers - Using a telephone number within your PPC ad is an eye catcher … that’s all. Not many people will pick up their phone and dial your number if they see your ad. So what you’re doing is just wasting space that can be used for a good message. Tests have been done and this was proven quite a few times … get rid of that phone number in the ad.

8. Not Bidding for Your Name - If your competition is targeting your company name as a keyword I’d suggest taking legal actions (if applicable). In our company we send out those legal letters at least every other month to a competitor. If you’re in a different situation … bidding for your keywords will mean more traffic and another real estate space devoted to you on that search results page. I’d even bid for the company name if there were no competitors at all. You will pay around 0.05 to 0.10 cents per click and see the amount of searches (impressions) that are done for your brand name. A little of extra statistics that shows you the possible growth of your company.

9. Lack of Affiliate Control - The company name is usually the highest converting keyword. Your affiliates know this and advertise under your company’s name in paid search. What happens is that not only do you now have to pay your affiliate for the sale “they” brought in, but you’ve already paid your due with your own advertising methods for that customer to know your name before the search. Be sure to prevent your affiliates advertising in paid search for your company’s name. All they are doing there is collecting the cash from your own advertising.

10. Not Separating Content Match from Search Results - This is a mistake 101. Yes it takes time, but any campaign should separate their regular search advertising from content match. This will allow you to get better reporting, set different cost per click, different budget and overall have a cleaner look at both of these campaigns. Just separate into 2 campaigns. Both will have same keywords but one campaign will be created only for “search” and the other one for “content match”.

11. Ignoring the Seasonal Copy - It works. Including a seasonal discount or a “holiday special” in your ad copy is a great way to increase your CTR and get more sales. Furthermore, your ad will clearly stand out from the rest. Make it a Christmas special, Spring special, Summer blow out, etc. Make it relevant to “today”.

12. Lack of “Exact Tracking” - You must be able to track every visit to your site from PPC advertising by the exact keyword, campaign and ad group used. To do so you can set variables (yourcompany.com/?keyword) or integrate your PPC campaigns with your website analytics software. This is the only way you can really calculate the effectiveness of every keyword you use to get traffic.

13. Paying for Negative Keywords - Design and other search engines allow you to report keywords for which your ads should not be shown. If you’re paying for “broad match” keywords, you’ll see a lot of visits from people who’ve typed your keyword with a word “free” or “stock” or “jobs”. Do you want to pay money for visitors who’re looking to pay $0 for what you sell? Do you want to pay money for visitors who are researching stock info on what you sell? Be sure to use that “negative keyword folder” to get rid of these worthless clicks.

14. Mistaking CTR with conversion rate when testing ads - We love to test and that’s great, but what should marketers look for when choosing which ads to keep and which to delete? Looking only at the CTR (click through rate) is a false indication of a better performing ad. If you add a word “FREE” to your ad, you’ll see a jump in your CTR but what good will it do?

15. Not Using Keywords in Ad Copy - This is a simple one. Put keywords into your ad copy for which you are serving the ad. Not only will your ad be more relevant but the keywords in it are going to be bold.

16. Not Calling Design - Ok, I am not a fan of being a “rat” or telling on someone, but my friend … when it comes to business and playing fair, you have every right to raise a flag when you see a competitor engaging in bad techniques. You’ll notice some of your competitors creating multiple accounts and having 2 ads simultaneously on the Design PPC results page. Design has a policy against this. Call Design and let them know if your competitor is doing anything that’s against the rules of the search engine. You’ll be amazed how quickly they take care of the problem.

17. Avoiding Brand Name Keywords - It is unfortunate, but many companies do not take advantage of their competitors. How do you do this? Bid on their brand / company name. Think about it … anyone searching for your competitor could easily be your customer instead. Why not have your ad show up under that keywords? What if they are still shopping around? What if they are searching for your competitor’s name because they saw their TV or radio ad. Bottom line is, bid on your competitor’s brand names. Most of the time the ROI on those keywords is excellent. If you get a “legal letter” from the competitors and it holds water, I’d suggest comply with it.

Other related and helpful articles about PPC mistakes

“Avoiding Search Hobgoblins”

“10 Worst AdWords Campaign Mistakes”

“The Pay Per Click Mistakes of a New Marketer“

Technorati Tags

ppc, sem, search marketing, paid search

Original source here...
Feb 14

Extra, Extra, Read All About It!

High Rankings Search Engine Marketing seminar is coming to Minneapolis March 15 & 16.

Jill Whalen is a pioneer in the Design world and I am very honored that she has asked me to join her and the excellent group of Design and PPC experts she's gathered to do this seminar.

My session is called, "UnDesign Your Search Marketing - Alternative ways to drive search traffic to your web site". I don't think there's been any kind of "how to" search engine marketing seminar in Minneapolis before, so this should be a very well-attended event. Plus there will be lots of networking with the speakers.

The Minneapolis High Rankings Seminar will feature some of the most experienced and talented search marketing trainers, most of which have spoken at major conferences such as Search Engine Strategies:

* Jill Whalen - High Rankings

* Scottie Claiborne - Successful-Sites

* Matt Bailey - Site Logic Marketing

* Christine Churchill - KeyRelevence

* Karon Thackston - Marketing Words

* Lee Odden - TopRank

Topics to be covered in the two day seminar include:

* Search Engine Optimization Overview

* Technical Design Issues

* The Nitty-Gritty of Writing for the Search Engines

* Social Media and Public Relations for Design

* Effective Keyword Research

* The ins and outs of Paid Search (PPC)

* Copywriting Your Way to Success

* Link Building

* Measuring Success

There's a 10% early bird discount if you register by Feb 15. PLUS there's an additional 25% discount for our Blog readers. Just use the code: TOPRANK.

Of course, if you're not interested in doing your own Design, you can always hire a search engine optimization company. :)

Original source here...